Print this article Print this article   |   Read this article in: | ES |

April 24, 2005



Network War: The US Military Formidable Hacker Posse

 

If attack is the best form of defense, then the US military establishment is on the war-path in cyberspace.

OS46035.jpg

According to an article recently published in Wired News, entitled "U.S. Military's Elite Hacker Crew", the U.S. military "has assembled the world's most formidable hacker posse: a super-secret, multimillion-dollar weapons program that may be ready to launch bloodless cyberwar against enemy networks -- from electric grids to telephone nets. "

A unit called the Joint Functional Component Command for Network Warfare (JFCCNW) has been set up to take overall responsibility for defending the US Department of Defense's computer networks. It is believed to be comprised of staff from the CIA, the National Security Agency, the FBI, the four military branches, some civilian experts and military representatives from allied nations.

The JFCCNW is also responsible for the "highly classified, evolving mission of Computer Network Attack", the CNA.


The group's existence came to light during a U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee hearing in March 2005, when military leaders from U.S. Strategic Command, or Stratcom, disclosed its existence.

The U.S. administration has never hidden the fact that it has invested heavily in defending its computer networks, which were apparently targeted nearly 75,000 times with intrusion attempts last year. But the Department of Defense has never admitted to having the capability to launch an offensive action in cyberspace.

electricwire_and_terminal_by_raton_man.jpg
Photo credit: David Alonso

In straightforward military terms, this capability means that the U.S. can destroy an enemy's computer network or sabotage radar.

The Wired article quotes Dan Verton, a former U.S. Marine intelligence officer and the author of the book "Black Ice", which investigates the threats cyber terrorism and vandalism could have on military and financial networks.

Verton said the Defense Department talks often about the millions it spends on defending its networks, but the department has never admitted to launching a cyber attack. It means they can penetrate enemy computers, steal or manipulate data and:


"set loose a worm to take down command-and-control systems so the enemy is unable to communicate and direct ground forces, or fire surface-to-air missiles, for example."

Verton says military personnel have told him numerous "black programs" involving CNA capabilities are ongoing, while new polices and rules of engagement are now on the books.

According to a former CNA commander, Air Force Maj. Gen. John Bradley, during a speech at a 2002 Association of Old Crows conference (a leading think tank on information and electronic warfare):


"I've got to tell you we spend more time on the computer network attack business than we do on computer network defense because so many people at very high levels are interested."

It is believed that the U.S. military first used this type of capability in Serbia in the mid-1990s. One story widely reported, but never confirmed, described how a team of military operatives was dropped into Serbia, and after cutting a wire leading to a major radar hub, planted a device that emitted phantom targets on Serb radar.

In the Summer of 2004, the internet-posted execution of American civilian Nicholas Berg sparked a debate about the offensive capabilities of the CNA program. The debate focused on whether the U.S. should shut down a website as soon as it posts such brutality, irrespective of what the implications are for free speech or what another nation's laws are. Others believe that 'terrorist sites' should remain up and running for 'intelligence' purposes.

This type of capability, however, opens up very many more questions for debate. It gives the U.S. military the means to shut down or destroy any online resource that it deems 'offensive'.

That, these days, can cover a great deal. And when a site is shut down, or a network destroyed, somewhere in the world, who's to know who's behind it.

Furthermore, as Dan Verton says:


"The reality is, once you press that Enter button, you can't control it. If the government were to release a virus to take down an enemies' network, their radar, their electrical grid, you have no control what the virus might do after that."


Reference: Wired News [ Read more ]
Conversation Tags:
 
Readers' Comments    
Related Articles



March 21, 2005
Internet Security Is Doomed Unless We Review Its Key Foundations And Architecture: US Experts And Mainstream News Report


It seems that everyone is so completely numbed by Microsoft smooth and systematic release of security patches, that the new mantra for feeling OK when it comes to Internet security is simply: "SP2 and automatic updates, with a sprinkle of good anti-virus, anti-spyware and a slice... read more



March 18, 2005
The Internet Has No Security Architecture: Public Key Infrastructure And The Road To Secure Online Spaces


Dammit, dammit, dammit! Photo credit: Nelson Syozi I spent a good part of last summer on national radio shows trying to alert people to what is happening to our information infrastructure. Time after time, the hosts would implore me with “Please tell our listeners what they can do... read more



April 14, 2005
Digital AZT: Is The Public Health System AIDS Cure The Best Approach To Secure The Internet From Malicious Software?


I was recently struck by the title of a short post pointing to what appeared to be security article entitled "A Public Health Approach to Preventing Malware Propagation" published by Technology Review. Photo credit: Nick Winchester The article is in fact only a short pointer to the master... read more



December 31, 2001
70 Free, Alternative and Independent Online News Sources


In this article: 1. Institute for Public Accuracy 2. American Prospect 3. Association of Alternative Newsweeklies 4. Al Martin Raw 5. Alternative News Group 6. The Arab-American Online Community Center 7. Antiwar 8. Arab News 9. Arena 10. La voz de Aztlan 11. Bildeberg - The High Priests of Globalisation 12. Blatant Propaganda and Suppressed Info 13. Blythe -... read more



March 31, 2003
Direct Video Feeds From The Iraqi War Zone Reuters Raw Video


http://reuters.feedroom.com/ = must have Online Resource FREE Reuters provides an extremely effective and well designed resource to access raw video footage mostly coming or relating to the Iraq war. With a 56Kbps or better connection (ISDN or better is really what you need to see this well) you... read more



December 31, 2001
What is really happening beyond the war media hype?


11 new articles which offer a chilling view on what is really happening In this article: 1. Freedom flees in terror from Sept. 11 disaster 2. U.K. Anti- Terrorism Bill Undermines Fundamental Human Rights Protections 3. Don't Sacrifice First Amendment to Terrorism, Ombudsman Warns 4. The Politics of Terror and... read more



posted by on Sunday, April 24 2005, updated on Wednesday, July 4 2007


 

 

 

 

Understanding comes from exploration

Home | Subscribe | RSS Feeds | Site map | Syndicate
Consulting | Publications
About | Privacy | Contact

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.





View blog authority

 

3196