The Making Of Reality And The Dupe Theory
This is an exercise in thinking. This is an exercise in evaluating how conditioned you are. "...This first level could be called PR/propaganda/intelligence. It involves painting a picture of the world and the forces of power that is completely conventional and acceptable to the masses. Namely, that there are nations and in some cases fanatically motivated groups (e.g., terrorists) who are trying to assert themselves against one another.
France versus England, England versus Germany, the US versus the USSR, and so on.
Hot wars, cold wars, economic wars, treaties, agreements, the breaking of treaties, more war.
This is what people have come to expect as an explanation about why things are as they are.
People buy in."
This is an exercise in evaluating how conditioned you are.
How much the news and media which permeate much of your life, outlook, attitude and interests shape your ability to see reality beyond them?
If you can digest the excerpted article below without ever stopping your genuinely curious-wondering you are a true Robin Gooder. I mean someone open-minded enough to consciously want to challenge his assumptions and strong beliefs on reality.
If your social-moral brain will stop you early in the reading don't insist. This is an exercise many don't enjoy. They like to hold on tight to the safe reality-turf they have modelled themselves into.
(by Jon Rappoport)
"In the many power struggles of the last century to establish more and more control over the populations of planet Earth, certain principles have been developed.
There are at least two levels of this Plan.
The first level involves concealment of the whole operation by giving it other faces and other reasons and other justifications.
This first level could be called PR/propaganda/intelligence.
It involves painting a picture of the world and the forces of power that is completely conventional and acceptable to the masses. Namely, that there are nations and in some cases fanatically motivated groups (e.g., terrorists) who are trying to assert themselves against one another.
France versus England, England versus Germany, the US versus the USSR, and so on. Hot wars, cold wars, economic wars, treaties, agreements, the breaking of treaties, more war.
This is what people have come to expect as an explanation about why things are as they are.
People buy in.
They understand nations as entities who have distinct and different objectives and who come into conflict with one another.
This makes sense to people, because this is how history is written and taught and learned, this is how news is reported, this is how governments actually DO operate.
One might say that governments are under the delusion that they are the prime entities of power.
After all, a government can order its army to attack another nation. Isn't this an obvious sign of power at work?
It would be a mistake to completely discount the influence of governments. At the same time, one has to realize that the IDEA that governments are the main power entities is misleading and false and foreshortened in its perspective.
But when you have government heads and spokespeople who make all the public pronouncements and who make the wars and who make the peace, well, this is very persuasive.
If you don't think so, just try to convince your neighbor that the real power entities on the planet are operating at a level behind and above the governments. See how far you get.
However, imagine for a moment that newspapers and TV networks suddenly shifted their focus and began reporting most major events as emanating from, say, corporations and foundations and secret societies and religious organizations.
How long would a steady stream of this take before populations began to see reality in a different form?
Reality is malleable, is a big piece of putty or taffy, and it only becomes solidified when the STORY OF REALITY is always reported in the same fundamental way.
Who are the sources quoted by the media in order to present a portrait of what is going on? Mostly government people.
Government people, of course, talk about what government is doing, and the media pick that up and relay it to the people, who think in turn that power struggles are ultimately between governments and populations with different national agendas.
This is one of the major jobs of media, this deception.
Now, the second principle of the Plan is, establish and nail down a map of the world in which governments and nations and sovereign territories have less and less and less to do with the real nature of events.
In other words, behind the front established through PR/propaganda/intelligence, create the true state of affairs:
- The deterioration of all governments.
- The weakening of populations.
- The division of the planet into regions instead of nations.
- The promotion of supernational entities which will handle the management of the population of earth.
To bring about these four conditions, many suboperations are mounted. Many.
For example, to drive a government deeper and deeper into debt forces that government to become, more and more, an all-embracing government-corporate being.
There are many names for the part of the Plan that involves bringing about the four conditions above. You can call it Communism or socialism or fascism or totalitarianism or state corporatism or parental government or bureaucracy or globalism or internationalism or even free trade. The names abound.
At the highest levels of this game, all those names are mere fronts.
They represent various bleeding-out operations designed to coalesce and meld the human race into one helpless aggregate managed by, in essence, a small number of people.
Those controllers are chess players.
A chess player does not attach himself to the meaning of any given piece on the board. He is not "a lover of the knight." He is not a devotee of the queen. He is a chess player.
And ideology in most forms is merely a temporary piece of propaganda designed to magnetize and polarize and divert populations.
Ideology is something that is invoked to explain certain moves on the board.
When the rook moves to a new square, that move is disguised under a variety of names and fronts and explanations, all of which are false.
In chess, there is only one thing that motivates the player. Winning the game.
However, if the people of Earth truly suspected that chess was the overriding operation, and all other news was a cover for THAT, the people would awaken to a degree that would alarm the controllers.
So instead of a naked chess game carried out under lights on a table, with all the pieces in full view, and with a record kept of all moves and counter-moves, we are being treated to (and victimized by) a gradually unfolding in which each move is disguised by STORIES and EXPLANATIONS that are, indeed, irrelevant to the actual strategy involved.
Now we come to the concept of the DUPE.
The dupe is a person or group that believes his actions are primary, when in fact those actions are submoves that fit into a much larger scheme.
The dupe thinks he is simply doing X, when in truth X is a fraction of what Y is all about. And Y is one aspect of RSTUVWXYZ.
An example: Dr. Jones, working out of a research lab in Ohio, believes he is doing experiments to find a better way of treating clinical depression. However, the small amount of new information (among much false information) he is contributing to the knowledge of how the brain works is being put together with many other pieces of such information---for the purpose of understanding the brain so that its responses can be controlled and predicted and artificially instigated.
As decades and centuries pass, the people bent on controlling the whole show called planet Earth learn how to play chess better. They find out how to play twelve-dimensional chess.
While this is going on, the people of Earth want to believe that they understand the basics of life on Earth and how power operates. For this, as I've said, are needed STORIES and EXPLANATIONS.
These stories and explanations are not simply one fine coat of lies spread thin like mayo on a ham sandwich. They are in layers, and these layers are designed to deflect and dead-end and divert investigators.
Meanwhile, even those investigators who begin to penetrate the obfuscations tend to stop too soon and think they have the whole exposure in hand.
Drug companies sell any old drug to the people so they can make profit. And that is truer than saying:
The drug companies sell drugs to cure disease.
But it is far more true to say the drug companies are very nasty dupes who are selling drugs so that, on balance, these chemicals can weaken people on a wide scale and make them easier to control.
In that sense, the drug companies are working on behalf of the real chess players who know that a world of weakened and confused and ill people are easier to make into slaves."
I know it does.
I also know that if when I start asking myself some of the questions I realize that my paranoid feelings are due to my long engrained prejudices about how things are and work.
But who provided me in the first place with those assumptions?
Can I challenge them and re-evaluate the true nature of things, or do I need to depend on a TV set and a newspaper to try to understand what is really going on with life on this planet?
Let me hear your thoughts on this.
blog comments powered by Disqus