Great article!
I'm studying Journalism and I found myself deeply interested in radio.
This as been pleasure to read.
Thank you.
Best Regards.
Is podcasting going to "alter" traditional radio as we know it today?
Some even believe that radio is dying altogether because of the rapid and sweeping emergence of podcasting and satellite radio complemented by the very low-quality programming of US-like commercial radio stations.
Photo credit: Ronaldo Taveira
While I do not think this will happen, I am 100% positive that podcasting will indeed have a major influence on traditional radio as we know it today.
Early adopters on the user side and aggressive radio station managers on the other are already driving some of the changes that will characterize the future of FM radio, and although the long-term effects of this impact are not yet fully recognizable, the transformation is already happening.
If it is not happening at your radio station too, it is time to regroup and ask yourself some serious questions.
Why would your audience keep listening to your radio if all the music they want and like can be more easily accessed via other means, with greater audio quality and more user-control?
How can your FM radio signal match the audio quality and reliability of a portable MP3 player, media phone or notebook?
Why would listeners continue to give attention to long, obnoxious, interruptive and irrelevant ad breaks like many commercial radios provide?
But there are traits and features that are unique to FM radio, and just like for Television, unless traditional broadcasters learn how to open themselves to the inevitable convergence with new media and the Internet they are indeed doomed to a slow and painful death.
The first thing traditional radio should acknowledge is that the times for being essentially a music jukebox are soon gone.
The competition coming from new media technologies like P2P file sharing, online music clearinghouses like iTunes, portable MP3 players, other nifty audio devices such as smart- and media-phones, and the gigantic podcasting wave provide so much more for the user experience, that for radio intended as a "music jukebox" this is a loosing battle from the very start.
Any new kid born today will never select to listen to radio over accessing her own MP3 playlist or personalized streaming radio station on the net. There is just no comparison.
So, what should traditional radio stations do to safeguard their future?
Radio as we know, has indeed some unique characteristics, and some of them, combined with the opportunities offered by the web and new media, can permit the creation of an altogether new form of radio, which spans the airwaves and the fiber while bringing into people media devices quality programming that can't be gotten anywhere else.
Photo credit: Rogerio Cunha
What are then the unique traits that traditional radio should strongly leverage?
What are some of the opportunities created by new media technologies and the web that traditional radios should integrate into their programming strategy?
Here are some starting points:
These are just some pointers, ideas and food for thought for where I see the future of radio being headed. There are many more that should be added and that I am sure you have been thinking about.
Many of the above points can certainly be applied to television as well and many more are likely missing.
What is clearly evident is that the podcasting wave is changing radio in many of the same ways other new technologies have changed the role of traditional media: blogs undermining newspapers, DVRs allowing viewers to skip commercials and time-shift the viewing of their preferred shows, and P2P revolutionizing the way we access and consume the music we like.
All these changes point to a common trait which characterizes all of the media revolutions happening in front of us today: media becomes a participatory medium in which the traditional listener becomes herself an active participant, contributor, stockholder, marketer.
Tune in.
2009-06-11 16:17:24 |
Great article!
I'm studying Journalism and I found myself deeply interested in radio.
This as been pleasure to read.
Thank you.Best Regards.
2008-04-28 05:15:42 |
Yes Jessie,
I am available.
You can reach me via Skype as "robingood" - make sure you reference this interview and article so that I knw who you are :-)
2008-04-28 04:52:18 |
Maybe you are available yourself?
Email me on jawesika@yahoo.com
2008-04-28 04:51:34 |
Hi I am doing an assignment on the future of Radio versus the IPOD and was wondering if there are any professionals out there who could do an interview with me?
Email me on jawesika@yahoo.com
2008-03-14 22:47:29 |
The future of traditional radio should also state the quality of radio sound and hifi capability. There is HD radio now that has CD quality reception. MP3 and related sounds and music can loose about 25 of the tones and the real beat of music. I like CD and above quality. Once you know the difference one would prefer HIFI CD+ quality.
2005-11-07 15:14:21 |
Hi Robin,
I completely agree that live performance is the crucial differentiator when recorded music becomes ubiquitous.
That’s why I launched a blog dedicated to live music webcast listings:
Live Net Music
www.livenetmusic.comAnd why I wrote a detailed response to an article in the UK's Guardian newspaper that incorrectly contrasted live performance and Internet distribution as opposing forces, rather than complementary ones:
www.broadbandstars.co.uk/2005/08/why_live_music_.html
Regards,
Colin