With 1000's of online video sites (e.g, see: http://www.ovguide.com ) now available covering all kinds of niche content, online video is definitely here to stay.
Yes, 2006 will be the year of online video.
This is what I wrote not more than a week ago here, while attempting to bring in to focus my first set of predictions on the upcoming web and new media future.
Video will indeed be a disruptive media force on the Internet, as it will further allow the entry and participation of smaller and independent players in both global and local markets.

Photo credit: Ben Goode
Online Video will affect news consumption, will change television viewing patterns and habits, and will give ways to new forms of entertainment and training.
The number of changes and transformations that video is just about to bring to the online world are too many and too significant not to be paid attention to.
So, not only I am fully confirming my belief that 2006 will be the year that video will establish itself on the Internet well beyond its present pioneering status, but I want to bring to the table a number of specific innovations that will see happening and that will definitely affect the way we use and consume video-based contents.
Those who will best understand and appreciate the key implications of the many deep changes that video is about to enable are those that, free of prejudice and past media views, will start to experiment, research and ride some of these formidable forces that are powering video media to be the most irresistible force in Web communication to rise up to wide popularity in the coming months.














What do you think?
| 2007-07-08 22:49:51 |
With 1000's of online video sites (e.g, see: http://www.ovguide.com ) now available covering all kinds of niche content, online video is definitely here to stay.
| 2006-11-13 08:32:20 |
Google Video Relay Service and learn where deaf utilizes video phones/conferences make calls to hearing person through video interpreters that is displayed on monitor. VI provides telephone interpreting for both deaf and hearing persons. Deaf signs to a video interpreter on computer monitor and then VI revoices sign for hearing persons..then hearing persons speak and VI translate into sign language. Cool, huh? This started in 1995 in Texas, but now is nationwide and VRS providers enjoying $27 million a month.
| 2005-12-24 22:43:17 |
Thank you Robin!
I'm living at Russia, and trying to build some kind of micro tv station....
The main problem is absense of unlimited broadband more than 1-2 mb/s.
And also, ulimeted traffic with 256 kb/s - costs enough...
But I think 2006'll year of UNLIMITED internet traffic & on-line video!
Continue doing your work man, you inspire people to do amazing things...
Thank you...
| 2005-12-22 20:55:50 |
Robin, Yes I agree that people like myself do not need the force fed, formula driven media world designed to sway our minds into buying products we really don't need or want, or change our attitudes and ways of thinking. They want freedom to express how they feel, they want to decide for themselves what is worthy and what isn't. We want to be able to influence the world around us rather then let the ones who control the media have all the influence and power. More often than not when you see commercials today they are not just about trying to sell you a product anymore, they are also trying to change your behavour and shape your attitudes. By doing this they can manipulate markets, create demand where there is none, and create wealth. If there is money to be made in people interacting on their own terms they will still have to get their tools and buy the products from the companies that own and control the media today to do it. After all we still have intellectual property rights, copy rights, and ownership. The way of the future with all this new technology alowing us to interact in these open ways looks in my opinion, to radically change this. I have an idea to make higher education available on one terabyte disc which, is do to come out within a couple of years this will mean most of your college classes you can buy on a $50. dollar cd and you can educate yourself and take the tests online for another fee of course. This will mean that information that is currently bought and sold in higher ed institutes will no longer be worth 50,000 a year for 4 years and all those professors will have to get real jobs.
What I'm trying to say is everything we buy is for the most part about entertainment - games, movies, music, cars, computers, TV shows, ect...
Do we like to buy our news? or our education as much? Do we really have to buy something to communicate our thoughts to and with the masses?
Do we now have to pay to give our thoughts to the world? Right now, the answer is yes. The internet that promised freedom of information turns out not to be true yet.
| 2005-12-22 08:49:12 |
Sean, I think you have a view of media and the online world that is just a projection of what you have learned over many years in traditional media. Things, audiences, hits and markets don't work the same way online. Look at the examples of blogs, at del.icio.us, podcasting... the disruption is not in allowing more people to become a superstar... fewer and fewer people are buying that road... what the new generations want is on-demand programming and the ability to talk back and publish what they are truly interested in firsthand.
Video does provide them this ability, while providing venues to a number of other fascinating things that are not going to compete with traditional TV and film, as they are serving totally different needs and people.
Maybe a good overview reading of the Long Tail article by Chris Anderson, could help you gain a bit more insight in why I see things so differently than you.
http://tinyurl.com/5m3o6
| 2005-12-21 21:44:27 |
I agree to a certain extent that video will become more common place and that average citizens will be able to use it as easy as they drive their cars today. But, as far as creating big studio works of art, movies, music videos, indepth news, latest information and the like, I don't agree. Why, because these are created for the most part by several individuals working as a team that have had training and schooling in the digital arts. It takes millions of dollars and still expensive equipment to make a major motion picture with top of the line computer graphics, stories and special effects which, frankly even though a PC can do alot, no one person will be able to compete with.
We are used to cutting edge graphics, perfect timing news, get it now TV that no small entity can compete with. There could be a thousand stories or articles on the same subject how you going to read them all and know which is the best and most truthful? Not possible, you have to have a filter and central point that does that for ya. What decides who has the best content today is obviously who has the most money and can sell the best advertising reaching the most ammount of viewers. And by no means is the competition fair. So I think only an occasional unique small entity ever hits it big. And these are quickly bought out by the biggest, or by one of the few competing to become the biggest. Kinda like how many new movie stars are discovered or made each year? Thousands might have the talent and skills but there is only so much room at the top.
However, on the same note holography and Nano tech will make for a faster next generation internet, new gaming opportunities, and new communication applications which, I believe will revolutionize the way we interact; and there will be new unforseen changes that could end the centralized information system we have today creating more fairness and freedom but, it wont be video by itself.
| 2005-12-21 15:39:00 |
Robin I have to agree with you. In watching how online video has been embrased by everyone aroud me. including my 5 year old daughter who already watches video on Turbo Nick, I think online video will experience huge gains in 2006.